For a tire with the primary goal of fuel economy, it has quite good grip on dry roads. On wet roads, it surprises you unpleasantly; even at a moderate pace in turns, it starts to hydroplane and understeer heavily. Not balanced in performance at all, I do not recommend it.

I have been using these specific tires since January 2022, which is almost 2 years ago, on a Nissan Pulsar. I am writing this because I believe that the overall impression of a tire is influenced to some extent by the car it is fitted on and the weight it needs to carry. I have driven thirty thousand kilometers and the wear has started to become noticeable with cracks on the tread. The grooves are still relatively fine, considering that they were not very deep to begin with. Overall, compared to the Primacy 4 tires that I was considering at the time, they have performed very well on both dry and wet roads. However, they wear out quickly. They provide a soft cushioning effect and the steering feel is just okay. As a first installation, I had the same Eco Contact tires, which, on the contrary, lasted over 60,000 kilometers in three years.

First fitment tires on a fiesta 125ps mhev st line. Absolutely unsuitable when there is increased rainfall in areas with standing water due to aquaplaning. At high speeds, it easily causes oversteer and generally hides the sporty character of the car. Paradoxically, Ford sacrificed the performance of a very well-designed car for a little extra fuel economy. They are only recommended for economical and conservative driving, those who drive fast are completely unsuitable and borderline dangerous.

After 1 year of use and 15000 kilometers, the tires have significantly lost their initial grip... On wet roads, it now requires great caution. It should be noted that tire wear was minimal compared to the driving I did.

Maybe I'm wrong and all modern tires have fake construction. Anyway, I can't give more than one star to this particular tire. I hit a small pothole and the tire tore on the sides just because it cracked (it didn't cut from a rock, it just cracked). And I'm not giving a low rating for that, but for the poor impression that the thickness of the sidewall made on me, it must have been at most 2-3 millimeters. Thickness as if it was a sheet of paper. In the cross-section, you can see that essentially the tire is a sheet of paper with a little bottom... Economy in materials but priced as one of the most expensive. I asked the vulcanizer for his opinion. He called them a failure, considering the old series 5 much better. He also told me that it's the only car tire that has gone flat on him from friction...

Size 205/55R16 on Opel Astra K 1.2 turbo. First installation tires and after 25,000 km they still hold up like the first day. Very comfortable and quiet even after two years of use. I will definitely put the same ones again since I have no complaints. They have never made me anxious on wet roads, even at high speeds. Also, in terms of wear, they seem to withstand, so I can confidently say that they are a very high-quality summer tire.

In order for a review to be valuable, the writer should not omit 2 parameters.
a) vehicle type
b) kilometers driven
I use these tires on a 1,300 Fiat Doblo commercial vehicle, with dimensions 195/60/16.
With the kilometers driven so far (13,000), I have to say that the tire is incredible.
1. Quiet in rolling
2. Very good in dry conditions
3. Excellent in wet conditions. I corrected a skid once.
4. Soft tire that I drove 40 kilometers fast on rough terrain, following the Acropolis in Kineta.
If they last me 45,000 kilometers, I will put them on again.
In the same car, I had Kleber tires (dangerous) and Pirelli tires (indifferent)

I have had them for 2.5 years. Soon I will go for a change, I always change tires every three years. Personally, I was disappointed with the grip in the rain, so now I will switch to all-weather tires. I didn't realize how much fuel they save, maybe after 20 years of driving I am still clueless... I have driven approximately 32,000 km with them so far. The treads look worn, they definitely last for 4,000-5,000 km max.

Very mediocre tire in all aspects, despite the claims it makes. In practice, it has nothing to do with what it declares. The only good thing is the little noise it produces, which is essentially not bothersome. Average performance in wet and dry conditions. And as for the mileage... not even close. Perhaps this company should evaluate and reconsider quite a bit.

Very good tire, excellent grip - even in wet conditions. In this aspect, I really felt the A in wet and sliding (economy). In contrast to the Michelin Primacy 4, which, although less noisy, started spinning/slipping relatively early, the EcoContact performed perfectly until the end of their use (which I do - 40,000 km). Better than the Efficient Grip, which I had before the Michelin, and which showed signs of wear and hardened relatively quickly. The only downside I found is the slightly louder noise compared to the previous ones, but I forgive it due to the other good characteristics. Now, when I change them due to mileage, I will put the same ones again. They really deserve it!

Compared to their siblings (sportcontact and premiumcontact), they wear out and get destroyed very easily. I have had them for almost 2 years (23 months) and they need to be replaced. I have already changed one during this time (I walked 200 meters with a puncture), and the other day I discovered a bulge in another one. With the previous ones, I got twice the lifespan (4 years). Never again will I choose eco series in any brand.

Very good grip under normal driving conditions with Ford Focus mk2. Slightly noisier than my previous Michelin Primacy.

Although I have been driving them for a month, they are very comfortable, quiet, and soft. What I must emphasize, however, is that they really help with fuel economy, especially in high-displacement vehicles like mine.

Extremely flexible tires! They offer economy, quietness during the journey, and definitely a sense of security (especially with children in the car).