Skroutz.gr

Nikon Full Frame Camera Lens AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Standard Zoom for Nikon F Mount Black
Camera Lenses

Nikon Full Frame Camera Lens AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Standard Zoom for Nikon F Mount Black

Standard Zoom, Bright Zoom, Autofocus , Manufacturer:

This product does not exist at Skroutz anymore
Product report

Specifications

Specifications

Dimensions

Type
Standard Zoom

Type

Standard Zoom
The visual they offer is very close to human eyesight and is often referred to as "normal". They provide a natural result with minimal distortions, while also having zoom capability. Their focal distance usually starts from 40-55mm in full frame, 25-40mm in crop frame, and 80-100mm in medium format.
Lens Type
Fixed Aperture Zoom

Lens Type

Lenses with variable optical (zoom) that remain equally bright (same maximum aperture value) throughout the entire focal distance range they offer. Usually significantly more expensive than their variable aperture counterparts.

Fixed Aperture Zoom
Lenses with variable optical (zoom) that remain equally bright (same maximum aperture value) throughout the entire focal distance range they offer. Usually significantly more expensive than their variable aperture counterparts.
Sensor Type
Full Frame

Sensor Type

Full Frame

Photographic lenses designed for use on full frame sensor cameras. A full frame lens can also be used on a crop frame sensor camera, but with its focal length adjusted according to the corresponding crop factor.

For example, a full frame lens with a focal length of 50mm (standard) on a camera body with a crop factor of 1.6 will function with a perspective as if it were an 80mm lens (telephoto).

The reverse does not work as the optics of a crop frame lens are not sufficient to cover an entire full frame sensor, resulting in the edges of the frame being black (severe vignetting).
Maximum Aperture (f)
-

Maximum Aperture (f)

Opening the diaphragm determines the amount of light received by the camera and affects the depth of field.
2. The most open aperture of a lens is called the maximum. The more open the aperture (smaller f-number), the shallower the depth of field.
Minimum Aperture (f)
-

Minimum Aperture (f)

Opening the diaphragm determines the amount of light received by the camera and affects the depth of field.

2. The smallest diameter of the diaphragm is the minimum value. The more closed the diaphragm (larger f-number), the greater the depth of field.
Filter Diameter
77 mm

Filter Diameter

The diameter that a filter must have to be applied on the lens without the use of an adapter.
Focal Length Range
-

Focal Length Range

The focal length is the distance from the convergence point of the light rays inside the lens to the camera sensor. As the range increases, we have a smaller field of view.
Focal Length
50 mm

Focal Length

It is the distance that the light rays need to travel to reach the focal point, that is, the lens sensor.
The smaller the focal distance, the larger the angle of view for the photograph and therefore the lens can capture more of what is in front of us.
Weight
900 gr
Mount
Nikon F

Mount

The type of mount that the camera body must have in order for the lens to be fully functional when attached to it.

2. Some lenses can be used with older mounts from the same manufacturer, sacrificing certain functions (e.g. autofocus), or even with mounts from other manufacturers using an adapter.
Colour
Black

Features & Functions

Image Stabilization
No

Image Stabilization

The lens features image stabilization function for clearer photos and videos when shooting handheld, especially in low light conditions.
Autofocus (AF)
Yes

Autofocus (AF)

The lens has an automatic focusing function. Particularly useful for photographing subjects in motion (e.g. children playing).
3D
No

3D

Lenses for creating stereoscopic images.

Usage

Device Group
-

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

See all specifications

Reviews (4)

Reviews

4.0
4
4.0
Review this product
  1. 5 stars
    0
  2. 4
  3. 3 stars
    0
  4. 2 stars
    0
  5. 1 star
    0
Review this product
  • Autofocus (AF) speed
  • Color representation
  • Construction quality
  • Acidity
  • Quiet
  • Value for money
  • Weight
  • vaggelhs4
    4
    0 out of 1 members found this review helpful
    vaggelhs4

    I got it second-hand. I had previously worked with the 24-120 and the holy trinity of AFS primes 35/50/85, all 1.8.
    At first, I was very skeptical about the 24-70, having the 24-120, but when I had to use it due to the theft of the 24-120, I threw away all the primes. I don't know what they did, but its sharpness is amazing. Better than the 50mm 1.8 and equal or slightly better than my favorite 35mm. It's like carrying multiple primes together. What it gives to the skin when shooting portraits is something else. When this is combined with VERY fast and VERY reliable AF, then you don't need anything else.
    As for the weight, it's something you have to get used to. You have to literally exercise to be a professional photographer. Think about it, the camera with flash and the 24-70 exceeds 2 kilos that you hold for 4 hours... Let's not even mention the 70-200, which is 1.5kg on its own.
    Of course, its AF is not silent, so if you use it for mirrorless video with the built-in microphone, you will definitely have a problem.

    A HUGE MINUS:
    The d750 has a built-in flash that I have used when the regular one "dies". The issue is that the lens is so long at wide focal lengths that it blocks the light emitted by the built-in flash, resulting in a dark spot in the center that is very difficult to correct with masking.

    You get this lens, put it on the camera, and only if something happens do you realize that it was there.

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Construction quality
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
    • Noisy
    • Weight
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 777marel
    4
    3 out of 3 members found this review helpful
    777marel

    The rubber on the lens loosened in the first year. But you don't have many options in the full frame. In my opinion, the VR version is not worth it

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Quiet
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Construction quality
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
    • Weight
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • MichalisL
    4
    13 out of 13 members found this review helpful
    MichalisL

    Extremely useful lens due to its range and brightness, I have had it for 1 1/2 years, I wouldn't spend more money to buy the new one with stabilizer, I don't miss it at all (which has more vignetting and is bigger and slightly heavier). The slight vignetting it has at very wide apertures can be easily corrected with one command in Adobe Camera Raw. Great sharpness in the center, it slightly deteriorates at the edges for the amount of money it costs, I expected it to be better.

    Its major drawback for me is that it is quite cumbersome due to its size and weight, especially because of its design, the weight center of the lens is too far forward, resulting in it being very tiring whether you hold the camera or have it hanging around your neck. Imagine that my Nikon 14-24 2.8 is much more convenient to hold, even though it is 100g heavier.

    Due to its range and fast focusing, it is ideal for professionals on the go (reportage, sports, etc.), I wouldn't recommend it to amateurs. For example, comparing it to the Nikon 50mm 1.4 in terms of image quality and color, the 50mm lens is significantly better. I would recommend prime lenses to amateurs who are passionate about image quality.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 4
    giorgosstat

    • Quiet
    • Weight
    • Construction quality
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
  • vaggelhs4
    4
    vaggelhs4

    I got it second-hand. I had previously worked with the 24-120 and the holy trinity of AFS primes 35/50/85, all 1.8.
    At first, I was very skeptical about the 24-70, having the 24-120, but when I had to use it due to the theft of the 24-120, I threw away all the primes. I don't know what they did, but its sharpness is amazing. Better than the 50mm 1.8 and equal or slightly better than my favorite 35mm. It's like carrying multiple primes together. What it gives to the skin when shooting portraits is something else. When this is combined with VERY fast and VERY reliable AF, then you don't need anything else.
    As for the weight, it's something you have to get used to. You have to literally exercise to be a professional photographer. Think about it, the camera with flash and the 24-70 exceeds 2 kilos that you hold for 4 hours... Let's not even mention the 70-200, which is 1.5kg on its own.
    Of course, its AF is not silent, so if you use it for mirrorless video with the built-in microphone, you will definitely have a problem.

    A HUGE MINUS:
    The d750 has a built-in flash that I have used when the regular one "dies". The issue is that the lens is so long at wide focal lengths that it blocks the light emitted by the built-in flash, resulting in a dark spot in the center that is very difficult to correct with masking.

    You get this lens, put it on the camera, and only if something happens do you realize that it was there.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • 777marel
    4
    777marel

    The rubber on the lens loosened in the first year. But you don't have many options in the full frame. In my opinion, the VR version is not worth it

    Translated from Greek ·
    3
  • MichalisL
    4
    MichalisL

    Extremely useful lens due to its range and brightness, I have had it for 1 1/2 years, I wouldn't spend more money to buy the new one with stabilizer, I don't miss it at all (which has more vignetting and is bigger and slightly heavier). The slight vignetting it has at very wide apertures can be easily corrected with one command in Adobe Camera Raw. Great sharpness in the center, it slightly deteriorates at the edges for the amount of money it costs, I expected it to be better.

    Its major drawback for me is that it is quite cumbersome due to its size and weight, especially because of its design, the weight center of the lens is too far forward, resulting in it being very tiring whether you hold the camera or have it hanging around your neck. Imagine that my Nikon 14-24 2.8 is much more convenient to hold, even though it is 100g heavier.

    Due to its range and fast focusing, it is ideal for professionals on the go (reportage, sports, etc.), I wouldn't recommend it to amateurs. For example, comparing it to the Nikon 50mm 1.4 in terms of image quality and color, the 50mm lens is significantly better. I would recommend prime lenses to amateurs who are passionate about image quality.

    Translated from Greek ·
    13
  • 4
    giorgosstat

    0
  • See all
Questions

Questions

Do you have a question about the product?

2 users have this product and can help you

Ask for the product

Specifications

Dimensions

Type
Standard Zoom

Type

Standard Zoom
The visual they offer is very close to human eyesight and is often referred to as "normal". They provide a natural result with minimal distortions, while also having zoom capability. Their focal distance usually starts from 40-55mm in full frame, 25-40mm in crop frame, and 80-100mm in medium format.
Lens Type
Fixed Aperture Zoom

Lens Type

Lenses with variable optical (zoom) that remain equally bright (same maximum aperture value) throughout the entire focal distance range they offer. Usually significantly more expensive than their variable aperture counterparts.

Fixed Aperture Zoom
Lenses with variable optical (zoom) that remain equally bright (same maximum aperture value) throughout the entire focal distance range they offer. Usually significantly more expensive than their variable aperture counterparts.
Sensor Type
Full Frame

Sensor Type

Full Frame

Photographic lenses designed for use on full frame sensor cameras. A full frame lens can also be used on a crop frame sensor camera, but with its focal length adjusted according to the corresponding crop factor.

For example, a full frame lens with a focal length of 50mm (standard) on a camera body with a crop factor of 1.6 will function with a perspective as if it were an 80mm lens (telephoto).

The reverse does not work as the optics of a crop frame lens are not sufficient to cover an entire full frame sensor, resulting in the edges of the frame being black (severe vignetting).
Maximum Aperture (f)
-

Maximum Aperture (f)

Opening the diaphragm determines the amount of light received by the camera and affects the depth of field.
2. The most open aperture of a lens is called the maximum. The more open the aperture (smaller f-number), the shallower the depth of field.
Minimum Aperture (f)
-

Minimum Aperture (f)

Opening the diaphragm determines the amount of light received by the camera and affects the depth of field.

2. The smallest diameter of the diaphragm is the minimum value. The more closed the diaphragm (larger f-number), the greater the depth of field.
Filter Diameter
77 mm

Filter Diameter

The diameter that a filter must have to be applied on the lens without the use of an adapter.
Focal Length Range
-

Focal Length Range

The focal length is the distance from the convergence point of the light rays inside the lens to the camera sensor. As the range increases, we have a smaller field of view.
Focal Length
50 mm

Focal Length

It is the distance that the light rays need to travel to reach the focal point, that is, the lens sensor.
The smaller the focal distance, the larger the angle of view for the photograph and therefore the lens can capture more of what is in front of us.
Weight
900 gr
Mount
Nikon F

Mount

The type of mount that the camera body must have in order for the lens to be fully functional when attached to it.

2. Some lenses can be used with older mounts from the same manufacturer, sacrificing certain functions (e.g. autofocus), or even with mounts from other manufacturers using an adapter.
Colour
Black

Features & Functions

Image Stabilization
No

Image Stabilization

The lens features image stabilization function for clearer photos and videos when shooting handheld, especially in low light conditions.
Autofocus (AF)
Yes

Autofocus (AF)

The lens has an automatic focusing function. Particularly useful for photographing subjects in motion (e.g. children playing).
3D
No

3D

Lenses for creating stereoscopic images.

Usage

Device Group
-

Important information

Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.

Reviews (4)

4.0
4
4.0
Review this product
  1. 5 stars
    0
  2. 4
  3. 3 stars
    0
  4. 2 stars
    0
  5. 1 star
    0
Review this product
  • Autofocus (AF) speed
  • Color representation
  • Construction quality
  • Acidity
  • Quiet
  • Value for money
  • Weight
  • vaggelhs4
    4
    0 out of 1 members found this review helpful
    vaggelhs4

    I got it second-hand. I had previously worked with the 24-120 and the holy trinity of AFS primes 35/50/85, all 1.8.
    At first, I was very skeptical about the 24-70, having the 24-120, but when I had to use it due to the theft of the 24-120, I threw away all the primes. I don't know what they did, but its sharpness is amazing. Better than the 50mm 1.8 and equal or slightly better than my favorite 35mm. It's like carrying multiple primes together. What it gives to the skin when shooting portraits is something else. When this is combined with VERY fast and VERY reliable AF, then you don't need anything else.
    As for the weight, it's something you have to get used to. You have to literally exercise to be a professional photographer. Think about it, the camera with flash and the 24-70 exceeds 2 kilos that you hold for 4 hours... Let's not even mention the 70-200, which is 1.5kg on its own.
    Of course, its AF is not silent, so if you use it for mirrorless video with the built-in microphone, you will definitely have a problem.

    A HUGE MINUS:
    The d750 has a built-in flash that I have used when the regular one "dies". The issue is that the lens is so long at wide focal lengths that it blocks the light emitted by the built-in flash, resulting in a dark spot in the center that is very difficult to correct with masking.

    You get this lens, put it on the camera, and only if something happens do you realize that it was there.

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Construction quality
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
    • Noisy
    • Weight
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 777marel
    4
    3 out of 3 members found this review helpful
    777marel

    The rubber on the lens loosened in the first year. But you don't have many options in the full frame. In my opinion, the VR version is not worth it

    Translated from Greek ·
    • Quiet
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Construction quality
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
    • Weight
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • MichalisL
    4
    13 out of 13 members found this review helpful
    MichalisL

    Extremely useful lens due to its range and brightness, I have had it for 1 1/2 years, I wouldn't spend more money to buy the new one with stabilizer, I don't miss it at all (which has more vignetting and is bigger and slightly heavier). The slight vignetting it has at very wide apertures can be easily corrected with one command in Adobe Camera Raw. Great sharpness in the center, it slightly deteriorates at the edges for the amount of money it costs, I expected it to be better.

    Its major drawback for me is that it is quite cumbersome due to its size and weight, especially because of its design, the weight center of the lens is too far forward, resulting in it being very tiring whether you hold the camera or have it hanging around your neck. Imagine that my Nikon 14-24 2.8 is much more convenient to hold, even though it is 100g heavier.

    Due to its range and fast focusing, it is ideal for professionals on the go (reportage, sports, etc.), I wouldn't recommend it to amateurs. For example, comparing it to the Nikon 50mm 1.4 in terms of image quality and color, the 50mm lens is significantly better. I would recommend prime lenses to amateurs who are passionate about image quality.

    Translated from Greek ·
    Did you find this review helpful?
  • 4
    giorgosstat

    • Quiet
    • Weight
    • Construction quality
    • Autofocus (AF) speed
    • Color representation
    • Acidity
    • Value for money
  • vaggelhs4
    4
    vaggelhs4

    I got it second-hand. I had previously worked with the 24-120 and the holy trinity of AFS primes 35/50/85, all 1.8.
    At first, I was very skeptical about the 24-70, having the 24-120, but when I had to use it due to the theft of the 24-120, I threw away all the primes. I don't know what they did, but its sharpness is amazing. Better than the 50mm 1.8 and equal or slightly better than my favorite 35mm. It's like carrying multiple primes together. What it gives to the skin when shooting portraits is something else. When this is combined with VERY fast and VERY reliable AF, then you don't need anything else.
    As for the weight, it's something you have to get used to. You have to literally exercise to be a professional photographer. Think about it, the camera with flash and the 24-70 exceeds 2 kilos that you hold for 4 hours... Let's not even mention the 70-200, which is 1.5kg on its own.
    Of course, its AF is not silent, so if you use it for mirrorless video with the built-in microphone, you will definitely have a problem.

    A HUGE MINUS:
    The d750 has a built-in flash that I have used when the regular one "dies". The issue is that the lens is so long at wide focal lengths that it blocks the light emitted by the built-in flash, resulting in a dark spot in the center that is very difficult to correct with masking.

    You get this lens, put it on the camera, and only if something happens do you realize that it was there.

    Translated from Greek ·
    0
  • 777marel
    4
    777marel

    The rubber on the lens loosened in the first year. But you don't have many options in the full frame. In my opinion, the VR version is not worth it

    Translated from Greek ·
    3
  • MichalisL
    4
    MichalisL

    Extremely useful lens due to its range and brightness, I have had it for 1 1/2 years, I wouldn't spend more money to buy the new one with stabilizer, I don't miss it at all (which has more vignetting and is bigger and slightly heavier). The slight vignetting it has at very wide apertures can be easily corrected with one command in Adobe Camera Raw. Great sharpness in the center, it slightly deteriorates at the edges for the amount of money it costs, I expected it to be better.

    Its major drawback for me is that it is quite cumbersome due to its size and weight, especially because of its design, the weight center of the lens is too far forward, resulting in it being very tiring whether you hold the camera or have it hanging around your neck. Imagine that my Nikon 14-24 2.8 is much more convenient to hold, even though it is 100g heavier.

    Due to its range and fast focusing, it is ideal for professionals on the go (reportage, sports, etc.), I wouldn't recommend it to amateurs. For example, comparing it to the Nikon 50mm 1.4 in terms of image quality and color, the 50mm lens is significantly better. I would recommend prime lenses to amateurs who are passionate about image quality.

    Translated from Greek ·
    13
  • 4
    giorgosstat

    0
  • See all